As the word itself state, pre-judice is “a preconceived
judgment or opinion” (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). So, the judgment is
made before collecting enough information about the object which is going to be
judged. We can observe an unambiguous example of prejudice in this article
about Katrina survivors (Stephens, Hamedani, Markus, Bergsieker, & Eloul,
2009). Observers, leavers, and, showing a lower intensity, relief workers are
biased by their own disjoint model of agency, causing difficulties to
understand the point of view of people who do not acted according to this
agency model. Consequently, their judgement is made without gathering enough
information about the other’s point of view, which generates prejudging.
This is why, personally, I decided to live
according to the principle of trying not to judge before knowing. Even, realizing
the practically impossibility of achievement of this goal, as the
implicit-association test shows (“Implicit-association test,” 2014). But, as a
philosophy of life or as a moral value, attempts of, at least, trying to know,
and to understand the other’s point of view is completely fundamental.
Following this effort of gathering knowledge and sympathising with the
dissimilar, a more accurate valuation might be done. Furthermore, in case we
would find it necessary, once we have known the reality of the external
perspective, we may make more efficient interventions.
According to the previous, my reflection
question would be presented as follows: What would be the best measures to evacuate
population that are not based on a disjoint model of agency from risks areas? From
my point of view, answering this question should be done after a deep analysis
of the situation and the reasons why these people do not follow a disjoint
agency model. For instance, due to the higher value in interdependence, and the
lack of a big income, and, in half of the cases, a car, I would consider a good
measure the promotion of cheap train tickets for larges groups of middle class
workers.
Carlos Alcalá
PS. If, as a reader, you have any special
interest in a broader argumentation of my ideas, please, contact with me
through alcalamarcos.carlos@student.kuleuven.be
References
Implicit-association test. (2014, March 30). In
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Implicit-association_test&oldid=595461075
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Prejudice. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudice
Stephens, N. M., Hamedani, M. G., Markus, H. R., Bergsieker, H. B., &
Eloul, L. (2009). Why
did they “choose” to stay? Perspectives of Hurricane Katrina observers
and survivors. Psychological Science, 20(7), 878–886.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario